The platform
Every artefact from the same evidence.
One diagnostic populates the whole system. Impact assessments, resistance plans, sponsor accountability, comms priority and pulse tracking all read from the scores you collected, so nothing has to be re-entered and nothing contradicts itself.
Runs in the browser · no implementation project · no certification required
Readiness profile · 214 responses
Grounding is the constraint
At 2.1 it is the one dimension below the 2.5 critical threshold. It drives the resistance plan.
Artefacts
2 of 5- Impact assessment12 groups
- Sponsor accountability map7 named
- Resistance plangenerating
- Comms priorityqueued
- Pulse schedulequeued
Example programme. Invented data, shown to illustrate the output.
What's in the platform
The instrument set, stage by stage.
Each stage adds instruments to the same programme record. What you own depends on the package you bought. Nothing here is a preview of something you have to upgrade to see.
Stage 1 · Diagnose
Establish the baseline
Scored readiness for every impacted group, before any plan is written.
Quick Diagnostic
A programme-level readiness score, a six-dimension complexity band and a recommended next step, in about 15 minutes.
Six-dimension assessment
The full 30-question Qognexus™ instrument, scored per group rather than per organisation. This is where per-group readiness starts.
Critical flag detection
Dimensions below the threshold surface as flags with the group attached, never folded into an average.
Preliminary QIP™ Scan
An early Change Impact Profile read on your most affected groups, used to prioritise the Design work.
Stage 2 · Design
Build the plan
Every artefact generated from the diagnostic data, then edited by you.
Stakeholder impact assessment
Group by group, with impact severity and readiness side by side, sorted into four priority bands.
Resistance classification
Resistance sorted into five named types, each derived from the dimension driving it, each carrying a severity and a suggested approach you make specific to the group.
Sponsor accountability plan
You name the sponsor for each group; the platform prescribes what they are on the hook for, from that group's Leadership score.
Comms and training priority
Sequenced by where the readiness gaps actually are, rather than by the communications calendar.
Stage 3 · Assure
Prove it's working
The same scores, re-measured, so direction is visible rather than inferred.
Pulse cycles
The full instrument re-run per group every four weeks, with 30, 60 and 90-day checkpoints created for you.
Readiness velocity
Rate of movement per group, week over week and smoothed. It is the difference between stalled and merely slow.
Intervention effectiveness
QET™ scores what you did against the movement it was expected to produce, so a workshop that changed nothing shows up as one.
Sponsor reporting
One export gives the sponsor view: readiness by group, the flags, and what moved since the last cycle.
What gets measured
Six dimensions, held per group.
The same six questions are asked of every impacted group and re-asked on every pulse. A programme average would hide the group that is about to fail, so the platform never reports one on its own.
Signal
Do they understand the change?
Intent
Do they want it?
Grounding
Can they actually do it?
Need
Do they have capacity for it?
Anchoring
Is the structure behind them?
Leadership
Is leadership actually leading it?
| Group | Weakest | Pulse | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance operations | Anchoring (ANC) | 3.8 | |
| Regional sales | Intent (INT) | 3.4 | |
| Shared services | Grounding (GRD) | 2.1 | |
| Plant supervisors | Leadership (LDR) | 3.5 |
Shared services is falling, not flat
Grounding is down 0.7 across four pulses. Every other group is level or rising.
Example programme. Invented data, shown to illustrate the output.
How a programme runs
Set up in an afternoon. Not a quarter.
There is no implementation phase on the self-serve packages. You create the programme, define the groups affected, and share the assessment link.
Create the programme and name the impacted groups
Groups are how everything else is organised: by function, site, role or whatever unit the change actually lands on.
Share the assessment link and collect the baseline
You distribute the link yourself, through whatever channel your people already read. Scores land per group, with critical flags surfaced as they arrive.
Generate the artefacts, then edit them
Impact, resistance, sponsor and comms outputs are derived from the data. Your judgement goes on top of the evidence, not in place of it.
Report to the steering group
From Assure, one export gives the sponsor view: readiness by group, the flags, and what changed since the last cycle.
Pulse, and watch the direction
Each cycle re-scores the same dimensions, so you can see which groups are moving, which have stalled, and whether the interventions are landing.
One platform, two access models
Two ways to hold the same evidence.
The difference is not the quality of the instruments but which stages the licence covers, how programmes are grouped, and how it is priced.
Practitioners
A workspace per client
- Each client isolated in its own tenant, not a folder inside yours
- Client-ready reports from the same evidence base
- The Diagnose and Design instruments; Assure stays with the client's own subscription
- Priced by how many clients you carry: three, six or fifteen
Business
A programme you own
- Diagnostic and Blueprint bought outright, one-off
- Assurance as a flat monthly or annual subscription, scoped to one programme
- Sponsor and steering-group reporting from Assure
- Portfolio scope across an estate is Managed Assurance, quoted
Being straight about scope
What the platform does not do.
Worth knowing before you buy rather than after.
It isn't a delivery planning tool
Implementation Tracking holds milestones, owned actions and workstream health, so readiness has something to attach to. But there is no Gantt and no resource plan, and it is not where your programme plan lives.
It isn't an engagement survey
The instruments measure readiness for a specific change, not sentiment about working here. They are not a substitute for an annual engagement programme.
Portfolio scope depends on your tier
Assure shows readiness across the programmes in a workspace. The view across every workspace, benchmarking between programmes and the QSM™ Change Saturation Monitor are Managed Assurance.
We don't run it for you
Your team runs the instruments and owns the judgement calls. Beyond guided onboarding in your first week on Managed Assurance, we do not staff the programme or run the cycles.
See what the instruments produce on your own programme.
The Qognexus™ Quick Diagnostic gives you a scored readiness picture, your critical flags and a recommended next step in about 15 minutes. It ends at a recommendation, with nothing recurring. It costs €1,500 flat, excluding VAT.
Want to see the output first?
Tell us about your programme and we'll walk you through a Qognexus™ report and the artefacts the Blueprint stage generates.
Talk to us